• Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.
Impact Factor:0.591 | Ranking:Sociology 94 out of 142 | Political Science 96 out of 161 | 5-Year Impact Factor:0.620 | 5-Year Ranking:Sociology 102 out of 142 | Political Science 99 out of 161
Source:2014 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2015)

The Essence of Military Group Cohesion

  1. Guy L. Siebold
    1. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciencesguysiebold{at}verizon.net

Abstract

In July 2006,Armed Forces & Society published an article by Anthony King, “The Word of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military.” This commentary takes exception to certain statements and conclusions in King's article, and in the process, sketches a standard model of military group cohesion. This model is based on social integration in the military and is composed of both primary group cohesion (peer and leader bonding) and secondary group cohesion (organizational and institutional bonding). The essence of peer bonding is given as social relationships based on trust and teamwork. The standard model is presented as a tool to sensitize ethnographers about what to look for when observing military interactions and to help them interpret what they see.

| Table of Contents