Armed Forces & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Segal, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 13, No. 1, 9-38 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X8601300101

The Military And the Family As Greedy Institutions

Mady Wechsler Segal

University of Maryland

This paper analyzes military families as the intersection of two societal institutions, both of which make great demands on individuals in terms of commitment, loyalty, time, and energy. It shows the increasing conflict between these two "greedy institutions' due to various trends in American society and military family patterns. The demands that American armed forces make on members and their families are described, including the risk of injury or death, geographic mobility, family separations, residence in foreign countries, and normative constraints on the behavior of spouses and children. Also discussed are trends that are increasing the potential military/family conflict, including general changes in women's roles in society (especially labor force participation) and specific changes in military family patterns, such as increases in the number of married junior enlisted personnel, sole parents, active duty mothers, and dual-service couples. Actual and potential military adaptations to these changes are considered, with particular attention to their implications for institutional and occupational trends in the military.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
D. Harrison and L. Laliberte
The Competing Claims of Operational Effectiveness and Human Rights in the Canadian Context
Armed Forces & Society, January 1, 2008; 34(2): 208 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
J. Griffith
Institutional Motives for Serving in the U.S. Army National Guard: Implications for Recruitment, Retention, and Readiness
Armed Forces & Society, January 1, 2008; 34(2): 230 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Armed Forces & SocietyHome page
L. M. Burrell, G. A. Adams, D. B. Durand, and C. A. Castro
The Impact of Military Lifestyle Demands on Well-Being, Army, and Family Outcomes
Armed Forces & Society, October 1, 2006; 33(1): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]