This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0095327X08330932v1 36/1/103    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ben-Shalom, U. Articles by Fox, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Military Psychology in the Israel Defense Forces

A Perspective of Continuity and Change

Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel & Military Psychology Center of the Ground Forces Command/IDF, uzibs{at}mail.biu.ac.il, uzibshalom{at}yahoo.com

Shaul Fox

Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel, foxsha{at}mail.biu.ac.il

The current article describes the development of military psychology in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Based on mixed methodology, including in-depth interviews and secondary analyses, continuities and discontinuities in the work of military psychologists are presented. Four phases of development are identified: "establishment of the military" (1947-1966), "decentralization" (1967-1982), "the small wars era" (1982-1999), and "expanded scope" (2000-present). Each phase generated a distinct military psychologist identity: "social scientist," "field practitioner," "organizational development expert," and "operational behavioral scientist." These identities are amassed cumulatively, so that new identities do not contradict previous ones. The four phases of development are compared according to several dimensions. Significant discontinuities include a change in theoretical perspectives, gender composition, and research methodology. Working style during conflict is notably continuous, characterized by bottom-up initiatives. Possible sources leading to the paradigmatic shifts are presented, and an "evolution model" of synthesis is suggested. This model stresses the social challenges facing the IDF and its relevant psychological practices.

Key Words: military psychology • military sociology • evolution of military psychology • IDF • Israel Defense Forces

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, 103-119 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X08330932


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?