This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hauser, W. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How Not to Lose in Iraq

A Commentary on Dr. Alice Hills’s "Fear and Loathing in Falluja"

whauser{at}att.net

The author commends Doctor Hills’s analysis but faults her conclusion that America’s involvement in Iraq is essentially different from that in Vietnam. After acknowledging six obvious differences, he goes on to enumerate crucial similarities: three in conflict origin, seven in geopolitical situation, seven in American military characteristics, and two in American national ethos. While praising the courage and skill of American military forces on the ground, he examines past and current strategic theories for countering insurgency and casts doubt on the ability of American forces as presently constituted and employed to succeed. He concludes that the current presidential administration, faced with this situation, is likely to maintain a pretense of success as long as possible and then "bail out" of the conflict, with potentially disastrous consequences for both Middle Eastern stability and American civil-military relations

Key Words: Iraq • insurgency • civil-military relations • strategy

Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 32, No. 4, 640-644 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X06287048


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?