This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Petraeus, D. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Military Influence And the Post-Vietnam Use of Force

U.S. Army

The caricature of America's military leaders as cigar-chomping, table-pounding warmongers reflects a common assumption that during crises, the military, in Pavlovian fashion, urge the use of arms. Such stereotypes, however, have seldom held true; they are particularly unsupported by the evidence in the post-Vietnam era. An examination of the cases since 1973 in which the use of force was considered reveals that the military's voice in presidential counsels of war has been neither the most bellicose nor the most commanding. On the other hand, America's senior soldiers have not been doves in uniform or of insignificant influence. The military frequently have influenced intervention decisions-even when they have sought to avoid the issue of whether force should be used. And when the discussion has turned to consideration of how to use force in a particular situation, senior military leaders have exerted considerable influence.

Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, 489-505 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X8901500402


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?